If you're not getting views on YouTube, it is almost always a skill issue with the content, and only rarely the algorithm. After running over 50 channels and coaching thousands of students, I check things in this order: get to 10 uploads before judging anything, see whether the videos are getting impressions at all, then audit the idea, packaging, audio, intro and talking points against the channel you're modeling. That audit is about 95% of the reason people aren't getting views. A shadowban or a bad niche is the odd exception.
This started as a quick guide and turned into an hour, because "why am I not getting views" is one of the most common problems I see with beginner YouTubers. I've made a few million dollars off YouTube, run over 50 channels (long-form, mostly faceless), and coached thousands of students over the past four years. This is everything that goes through my head when someone asks me that question.
Start with ownership. My biggest recommendation in business is to have extreme ownership and assume everything is your fault. There are a few cases where it really is out of your control, so here's the split.
| In your control | Out of your control (when you're small) |
|---|---|
| Content quality | Algorithm changes |
| Consistency in posting | Viewer behavior and the market changing |
| SEO (title, tags, description) | Competitor actions |
| Engagement and calls to action | Platform-wide trends |
| Thumbnail design and packaging |
SEO matters more when you're small. When you're bigger, good content carries it (I've had videos with basically no title still get 100,000 views). When you're starting, you need to point the algorithm in the right direction. If your first 10 impressions are bad data and nobody clicks, it confuses the algorithm and it takes you even longer to get results.
The idea, the thumbnail and the packaging are probably 80% of the results on a video. The quality of the content is the execution, and it's what makes people watch your videos over and over.
On the right column, the market changes fast. What worked three years ago doesn't work today. I've seen channels making a million dollars a month fall off because they got lazy and didn't adapt.
None of that is an excuse. I see people play the victim far too often ("it's the algorithm's fault"). Take ownership of everything, and further down I'll tell you when it makes sense to pivot.
I see people look for gimmicks and ways around the system. If you cheat the system, you're cheating yourself.
I'm saying this from personal experience. My first ever YouTube channel taught people how to flip real estate, about six years before I recorded this. I wasn't getting views, so I went and bought views. I got a lot of views for a couple of days, and when they went away, nothing happened. If anything it set me back.
Subscribers are a vanity metric. Even views are a vanity metric to a certain extent. None of it matters if you're not making money and you're not getting better. So no bought views, no bots, and paying for ads isn't going to fix it either.
First question: do you have less than 10 videos on the channel?
If you're brand new and under 10 videos, keep uploading. Some channels need around five to eight uploads before one goes viral. I've had many channels where the first video got a million views, so it happens, but five to eight is the safe bet, and around 10 is the cutoff where I start judging.
| Where you are | What I'd do |
|---|---|
| Under 10 videos | Keep uploading. Learn something from every upload. |
| 10 videos, a few over 1,000 views | Keep going to video 20. As a beginner, expect video 20 or 30 before any big decision. |
| 10 videos, none over 100 views | Be concerned. Fix the problem before you put more money in. |
| 20 to 30 videos, no money | Ask whether the niche is the problem (covered below). |
In the early stages, uploading a video and not learning anything from it is literally burning cash. Learning something on every upload is worth more than whatever that video pays you, so focus on skill acquisition over views and money at the start.
If you're a student in my program, this is when you get on a call with a coach and do a channel review, your videos next to the competitor's. I'd do it around upload five too.
Next question: are you getting impressions?
If you're getting no impressions at all after 10 uploads, you might be shadowbanned. In my experience that's typically a channel on the borderline of YouTube's community guidelines: violence, guns, a lot of swearing, nudity on screen. Think of a body cam niche. When a brand new channel uploads that kind of content, YouTube is a lot more hesitant to promote it.
The fix is to make your videos as PG-13 as possible. And I mean PG-13 like back in the '90s, because PG-13 today is completely different from what it used to be.
If you're in a more evergreen niche, be patient. I've had students upload 15 high-quality videos with maybe one over 1,000 views. They waited it out, and six months later one of the videos got 50,000 views almost instantly.
If you're getting more than 1,000 impressions on a video, it's more likely to be a skill issue. The algorithm is pretty sophisticated now. If you're a beginner in a normal niche, you're probably not shadowbanned. You probably just need to get better at making content.
One thing that helps with impressions is changing the thumbnail. Every time you change it, you can get new impressions. When a video starts to die off, I swap the thumbnail (roughly every 1,000 impressions or so) and the video gets fresh eyeballs.
Don't change anything drastic. On a new channel, the difference between a million-view video and a 100-view video is often a few small tweaks.
At the start you're just trying to get out of the no-view zone. These are the things I use.
Community tab. When I recorded this, every channel had access to the community tab. Post a poll, a quiz or a meme a few times a week, every day if you can (you can schedule them months out). It runs on a different algorithm than your long-form videos. On other channels this has gotten me a few extra million impressions a year and around 10,000 additional subscribers a year.
Pinned comments. Every single video. I mostly use it for a call to action, MrBeast style ("subscribe and I'll give you a cookie"). Make it fit your niche. If you're talking to lawyers, it's "subscribe to pass your bar exam."
Comments on other channels. This is my one YouTube superstition: a new channel that never engages on the platform looks like a bot. So when I set up a channel, I leave genuine comments on a few channels in my niche. No "sub for sub."
Shorts. I focus on long-form because it pays well. But Shorts has a different algorithm, and I've had students clip their long-form videos into Shorts to get a seed audience (or get monetized) faster, then stop posting them.
Niche communities. Reddit and Facebook groups are pretty solid. If I'm running an ancient history channel, I want my video in ancient history groups, in front of super fans. Some communities are all for it, some aren't.
Other short-form platforms (weak for faceless channels). Someone scrolling TikTok, Reels or X is a different type of viewer.
I once had a guy who was big on TikTok build a page for one of my YouTube channels. We got around 400,000 views on TikTok in about two months. That turned into roughly 50,000 views on YouTube and something like $300 to $500. For a faceless channel, put all of your resources into making good long videos.
When I start a channel, I typically start it in a niche where I already have resources. If I have a channel getting 100,000 views a day in basketball, the best thing I can do is set up another basketball channel and end screen it from the popular one.
If you don't have a channel like that, an end screen from somebody else's channel tells you immediately whether your videos are good, because you get views and you get data. There's no established marketplace for it. It's usually a friendly favor, though you might be able to pay $500 or $1,000 for one. A lot of creators won't do it because they think they're creating a competitor.
End screen viewers just watched an entire video on the same kind of topic. They're the best viewers you can get.
The mental model is an organ transplant. If the kidney matches, the body accepts it as its own. If it doesn't, the body rejects it. If those viewers leave your video fast, the algorithm reads it as a channel people don't want to watch. So don't do it with weak content or a one-video channel.
Apply the scientific method to YouTube. If you put one ingredient of a hamburger (a piece of lettuce) in a Petri dish, you know what the bacteria is reacting to. If you blend the whole hamburger and throw it in, you have no idea. You want the least amount of variables possible.
So rate yourself from one to five on how close you are to the channel you're modeling:
As a beginner you want to be as close to five as possible, without taking their graphics, their exact idea or their actual video.
If they make "How Elon Musk Spends His Billions," you make "How Jeff Bezos Spends His Billions." If their intro is "Have you ever wondered how much Elon Musk spends?", yours asks the same thing about Bezos. If they cover Elon's backstory and then all his cars, you do the same for Bezos. They use yellow, you use yellow. They use a joyful piano song and a bold thick font, so do you.
You do this to get into the algorithm, and to learn how production works. Under 100 views, you could make the most masterful video of all time and never know it.
Get to where you're making $5,000 to $10,000 a month, around 100,000 views a video. Then start playing with variables and create your own style.
Don't steal people's art. Don't download and upload somebody else's video. Mimic the format and the process, and change the subject.
I go further into repeating one format in why your YouTube videos aren't going viral.
Sunk cost fallacy gets a lot of people here. They invest a lot of emotion into the channel, and when you're emotional you can't make good decisions.
Audit as logically and unattached as you can. Pretend you just found this YouTube channel. Watch the competitor's videos, then watch yours.
Is your stuff as good as theirs? If it isn't, why should this video get views? That doesn't mean fancy editing or paying $1,000 a video. Does it give the same feeling the competitor's video does?
From the top down, these are the five things I check:
This part is typically 95% of the reason people aren't getting views.
I know YouTube is a creative platform. I view it as a business. If the priority is making enough to quit your job and do this full time, go do what's already working first. Once this is your full-time thing, you have the luxury of being creative.
The analogy: a UFO lands in your backyard and you want to build another one. You take it apart, work out what every piece does, and remake it. Do that with the videos in your niche. The language, the tone, the font, the sound effects and how loud they are, where the clips come from. Then do it again and again.
If the thumbnail is where you keep losing, read the faceless YouTube thumbnail guide.
The algorithm prioritizes watch time, session duration and engagement. So ask yourself: are people quitting YouTube after your video, or can they not wait for the next one?
We call it viewer satisfaction. If you're not satisfied and obsessed watching your own videos, I doubt anybody else is.
The mistakes I see over and over:
How I do tags: a couple of broad niche tags, then the specific topic, then the channel name and a couple of competitors' channel names. For a basketball video on Michael Jordan that's "basketball," "NBA," "Michael Jordan." If LeBron James isn't in the video, don't put LeBron James in the tags.
I don't care about CTR or AVD that much. It's all relative. I care about views.
My most viral videos have around 6 million views. A lot of them have about a 3% CTR and a 30% to 40% AVD on a 10-minute video, which is pretty bad on paper. As a video goes out to a broader and wider audience, your numbers go down.
Keep them somewhat healthy, and don't chase a 20% CTR. Under 1,000 impressions, CTR and AVD don't matter at all. High numbers come naturally when you have good ideas and good execution.
For more on how the recommendation system works, see the YouTube algorithm explained.
Say you've uploaded 20 or 30 videos and you're not making money. Now the niche question is fair. Ask it precisely.
Are people who started three months ago making $30K a month in this niche, with videos that aren't that good? If yes (and they don't have a bigger channel or an audience on another platform promoting them), it's a skill issue on your end.
Are there no new channels, and the biggest ones are barely making $30K a month? Then it's probably not a good niche.
If you're a beginner, ViewStats is pretty accurate for seeing how much money a channel is making. My process for choosing is in how to pick a faceless YouTube niche.
| The problem | The move | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Niche is too broad | Go to a sub-niche with less competition and similar interest | General basketball videos become basketball documentaries, basketball drama or championship game breakdowns |
| Niche is too narrow | Bring in pop culture so more people can care | "How to hire lawyers for your law firm" becomes "Lawyer reacts to Suits" |
Be careful of sunk cost ("I've put so much into this, I can't let it lose").
I've seen people totally bomb on one channel, start another, and make $10,000 in the first week on the new one. And if you're making a couple grand a month but you're stuck, you can start a second channel to test new ideas without abandoning the first.
If this is one of your first channels and you're not getting views, do not buy a monetized channel. It's a waste of money. If you have your own old channel sitting inactive, you can revive it with fresh content. If you're moving it to another niche, rebrand it and turn off the setting that posts new uploads to the subscriber feed.
Last thing. YouTube is a long game. Some evergreen channels take six months to get views on a video. If you're a beginner and the views aren't there, assume it's a skill issue. That way you give yourself room to get better.
Devon Canup's answer is that it is usually a skill issue with the content itself. After running over 50 channels, he puts about 95% of no-view problems down to the idea, packaging, audio, intro and talking points not matching what already works in the niche.
Devon recommends getting to 10 uploads before judging a new channel, because some channels need five to eight uploads before one goes viral. Beginners with a few videos over 1,000 views should keep going to video 20 or 30.
In Devon's experience, the sign is no impressions at all after 10 uploads, usually on content near the edge of YouTube's community guidelines (violence, guns, heavy swearing). If a video gets more than 1,000 impressions, he treats it as a skill issue.
Devon says CTR and AVD don't matter under 1,000 impressions and are relative after that. His most viral videos, at around 6 million views, often show about a 3% CTR and a 30% to 40% AVD on a 10-minute video.
Devon's test, after 20 to 30 uploads with no income, is whether channels that started three months ago are making $30K a month in the niche. If they are, the issue is skill. If the biggest channels barely make $30K a month, the niche is the problem.
Faceless Channel Academy is the coaching program I run for people building faceless YouTube channels: niche, formats, team, packaging, with an advisor and live calls. Book a free strategy call and we'll look at where you are and whether it's a fit.
Book a Free Strategy Call →Not ready to talk? Grab the free niche research template first.