When I recorded this in January 2026, the estimate was that three million plus YouTube channels had been terminated or demonetized since YouTube's July 15th update, the one where they were going to take down a bunch of AI channels. I went through a list of terminated channels, and the patterns I saw were fake AI politics and news, fictional AI storytelling, raunchy kids content, IP violations, obvious community guidelines issues, low-effort spam and general AI slop, plus a few channels that looked wrongly flagged. My own faceless channels use some AI, had no issues and were making record months, so my read at the time was that if you make good content you will be fine.
People were calling it a YouTube apocalypse. The estimate at the time was three million plus YouTube channels terminated or demonetized since YouTube came out with its July 15th update, the one where they were going to take down a bunch of AI channels.
That sounds scary, and I was seeing so many people on X freaking out about it. But I have a bunch of my own faceless YouTube channels. We even use some AI to produce the videos. We hadn't had any issues. We were actually making record months.
I also coach over 800 people building faceless YouTube channels. We'd had a couple of issues, but not really. I did see people who were afraid or paranoid about the situation, so I wanted to clear the air and look at which channels were actually getting terminated.
Everything here is my read from January 2026, from scrolling through a list of terminated channels. These are the patterns I noticed. It is not a list of rules from YouTube, and things may have changed since.
If you make videos that have value in them, and it's not garbage or slop or you trying to sensationalize something, you'll be fine.
If anything, I think YouTube is going back to a place where it's a good platform again. They're competing against Netflix and against every other platform, like TikTok, Instagram and X. The social media competition is getting crazy, especially with AI, and I see YouTube trying to take a lead by making the platform better.
My view when I recorded this was that a genuine channel had the best opportunity ever.
I found the list through somebody on X. You can scroll through it and see the channels that are getting terminated. (It didn't show the ones having monetization issues.)
Here's everything I noticed.
| Pattern | What I saw on the list | My read at the time |
|---|---|---|
| Fake AI politics and news | It seemed like half of the list. Fake space news too | Stay out of news unless you do real research |
| Fictional AI storytelling | AI story channels, including kids stories | I would not start one of these |
| Raunchy kids content | Brainrot pages, weird AI kids stories | I think it's good that it's coming down |
| IP violations | Pages pretending to be big YouTubers, clip pages, stolen clips | Don't run compilation channels without permission |
| Community guidelines issues | Sexualized content, gambling, the occasional hunting video | These make sense |
| Low-effort spam | A ton of videos posted in a short period | YouTube wants real, valuable content |
| General AI slop | AI Pope videos, AI body cam channels | YouTube is taking a stand on it |
| Channels that didn't make sense | A fishing channel, channels with near identical thumbnails | Probably wrongly flagged |
Number one, I was seeing a lot of political channels getting terminated, and a lot of it was fake AI politics. It seemed like half of them were this.
That makes sense to me. There's a lot of fake news that YouTube has to fight against. A lot of these channels are literally fake news pages, or they're trying to push some sort of agenda and sensationalizing stuff. That can't be healthy for a platform like YouTube.
I'd say if you stay out of news, you should be fine.
I do have a channel in geopolitics, and we were perfectly fine. But we do really good research. It's not AI garbage. We take different perspectives on things, we take pride in trying to get the facts accurate, and we don't try to sensationalize anything. We look at what's going on in the news and give our take.
I also saw a lot of space content getting taken down that was just fake space news. I classify that as news.
Google has its own AI video tool (Veo). If anything, Google and YouTube love AI content. That being said, it seems like they have a tough time with fake storytelling content.
I saw it somewhat frequently on the list. Fully AI channels telling fictional stories. It seems like YouTube likes AI, but has a strong stance against fictional AI stories. I would probably not start one of those channels.
I don't know where the future of this goes, because I kind of like the idea of this type of content. I think they were getting huge allegations of AI slop and were trying to make a stand against that. Maybe in the next six months to a year they repivot.
So if AI is supplemental to the content you're making, and it isn't the whole content, that seems like it'll be okay.
Kids content is a big part of this. From what I've seen, it's like one in three videos on a kids channel these days is this AI storytelling. I think YouTube is trying to find a balance, where you can have storytelling without creating a hyper unrealistic world and playing it off like it's not AI.
To be fair, I still saw a lot of AI storytelling channels that didn't have any issues. But I saw a good amount of them on the terminated list. More on the monetization side in can you monetize AI faceless YouTube channels.
There were a lot of raunchy kids channels getting terminated, which I think is good. Brainrot pages. "Cute kid" AI storytelling that gets kind of weird. There's definitely some weird stuff on the platform that they're trying to clean up.
What I think is happening is these channels play it off as if it's not kids content when it definitely is, and they're trying to game the system.
The next pattern is IP violations. That came in a few forms:
My advice is don't do a compilation channel of other people's content unless you have their permission. I cover more niches like this in YouTube automation niches to avoid.
Some of these were obvious community guidelines issues. Channels making insanely sexualized content (a lot of it looked like AI). Gambling. I'd even see the occasional hunting video.
Then there were the low-effort channels that spam a bunch of content. One was a how to speak English course that was posting a ton of videos in a short period of time with very low effort.
And then general AI slop. A channel doing AI Pope videos. A lot of AI body cam channels. On one of them I didn't understand why YouTube would have an issue with that niche specifically, but it seems like they're really taking a stand on that stuff.
My read is that YouTube wants to compete against a Netflix, but with real people and personalities, or at least real valuable content, like the media publishing companies make.
I'll be honest. Sometimes I'd scroll through and there was a channel where I couldn't put a finger on why it was terminated.
One seemed like a normal channel with pretty good content. (Maybe they stole the videos. That does happen from time to time.) Another was a fishing channel that didn't make sense to me.
The thing I noticed on the ones that didn't make sense was the thumbnails. They used the same thumbnail style every single time. I think the system reads that as AI slop, like a garbage channel reposting the same video over and over. I'd seen this with some middle size channels.
There are some glitches in the AI software, for sure. I expected that to get patched.
If that happened to a channel like that, I'd submit a claim to YouTube or post about it on X. I'd been seeing a lot of wrongfully terminated channels get reinstated, and my guess was these would get it back pretty quickly.
I know that's not the best thing for click-through rate. But it seems like if every other thumbnail uses a different style, you can keep going back to your proven formats. You don't want 10 in a row that all look exactly the same. (For the design side, see the faceless YouTube thumbnail guide.)
Beyond that, most of the ways I teach people to build faceless YouTube channels or AI channels have nothing to do with anything on that list. I've seen other gurus online teach how to build these channels, and I knew from day one it wasn't a good idea. I was always pushed away from the low-effort, weird stuff.
If you make any videos except those ones, my read is you should be fine.
In January 2026 Devon Canup went through a list of terminated channels and mostly saw fake AI politics and news, fictional AI storytelling, raunchy kids content, IP violations, community guidelines issues, low-effort spam and general AI slop. This is his read of the pattern, not an official statement from YouTube.
When Devon recorded the video, the estimate he cited was three million plus channels terminated or demonetized since YouTube's July 15th update.
Devon's read at the time was yes, as long as AI supplements the content. His own faceless channels use some AI, had no issues and were making record months. He said he would not start a fictional AI storytelling channel.
Devon's advice was to stay out of news, because about half of the terminated channels he saw were fake AI politics or fake news. His own geopolitics channel was fine, which he puts down to real research, accurate facts and not sensationalizing.
Devon's guess is yes. The wrongly flagged channels he found used the same thumbnail style on every video, so he recommends a different style on every other thumbnail and never 10 in a row that look identical.
Devon suggested submitting a claim to YouTube or posting about it on X. He said he had seen a lot of wrongfully terminated channels get reinstated, though that is his observation and not a guarantee.
Faceless Channel Academy is the coaching program I run for people building faceless YouTube channels: niche, formats, team, packaging, with an advisor and live calls. Book a free strategy call and we'll look at where you are and whether it's a fit.
Book a Free Strategy Call →Not ready to talk? Grab the free niche research template first.